Quantcast
Channel: Tax Updates - Daily Update
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 26324

M/s. BGH Exim Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs, Kandla - Customs - Case Laws

$
0
0
M/s. BGH Exim Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs, Kandla - Customs - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - Tri - Penalty under the provisions of Section 117 read with Section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Non clearance of the goods from the warehouse - Held that - Appellant had imported various consignments and inadvertently has not cleared the consignment of 4.99 MT within a stipulated period of one year, as provided under Section 72 of the Customs Act, 1962. I find that the appellant has cleared the consignm................................... Customs - Case Laws

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 26324

Trending Articles