UNITED CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., KANPUR - Customs -...
UNITED CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., KANPUR - Customs - CESTAT NEW DELHI - Tri - Refund claim of Additional duty of Customs - Refund claim of SAD - Limitation - The appellants...
View ArticleRefund claim of Additional duty of Customs - Refund claim of SAD - Limitation...
Customs - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Refund claim of Additional duty of Customs - Refund claim of SAD - Limitation - beneficial circular to be applied retrospectively while oppressive circular applicable...
View ArticleSANTOSH STARCH LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA - Customs - Case Laws
SANTOSH STARCH LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA - Customs - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - Tri - Refund of excess duty paid Imports under DFIA scheme in terms of Notification No. 40/2006-Cus., dated...
View ArticleM/s SAFE SURE MARINE SERVICES PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX -...
M/s SAFE SURE MARINE SERVICES PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX - Service Tax - CESTAT MUMBAI - Tri - Demand of service tax - Manpower recruitment or supply Agency Services - Ship Management...
View ArticleManpower recruitment or supply Agency Services - the appellant was required...
Service Tax - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Manpower recruitment or supply Agency Services - the appellant was required to arrange for masters, officers and crew on-board the vessel - demand and penalty...
View ArticleSTC Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai -...
STC Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai - Service Tax - CESTAT CHENNAI - Tri - Stay application - Demand of service tax - Commercial Training and coaching service - Held...
View ArticleM/s STC TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX - Service Tax...
M/s STC TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX - Service Tax - CESTAT CHENNAI - Tri - Application for modivation of stay order 2013 (12) TMI 215 - CESTAT CHENNAI - Demand of service...
View ArticleStay application - applicant had undertaken the activity for railway line at...
Service Tax - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Stay application - applicant had undertaken the activity for railway line at railway siding - siding is a part of railway - Railways are not covered under the...
View ArticleM/s GANGADHAR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND...
M/s GANGADHAR DEVELOPERS PVT LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX - Service Tax - CESTAT KOLKATA - Tri - Waiver of pre deposit - Demand of service tax - Discretion under Section 35...
View ArticleCommercial Training and coaching service - The applicant has not been able to...
Service Tax - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Commercial Training and coaching service - The applicant has not been able to demonstrate that 50 percent of the course fees collected is actually cost of course of...
View ArticleRefund claim rejected Unjust enrichment - the appellant s have not recovered...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Refund claim rejected Unjust enrichment - the appellant s have not recovered the amounts of duties from their customers so as to attract the unjust enrichment...
View ArticleWhether the Laffa charges collected from the customers which are for the...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Whether the Laffa charges collected from the customers which are for the purpose of avoiding of the glass shifted during transit by placing wooden baton in between...
View ArticleManufacture of Aluminium door and window frames fabrication at site of the...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Manufacture of Aluminium door and window frames fabrication at site of the customers bonafide belief as regards non-excisability of the product - demand beyond...
View ArticlePATEL ALLOYS (STEEL) (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., AHMEDABAD -...
PATEL ALLOYS (STEEL) (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., AHMEDABAD - Central Excise - CESTAT AHMEDABAD - Tri - Penalty u/s 11AC r.w. Rule 15 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - transfer of capital...
View ArticlePenalty u/s 11AC r.w. Rule 15 of CCR - transfer of capital goods to other...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Penalty u/s 11AC r.w. Rule 15 of CCR - transfer of capital goods to other unit without reversing cenvat credit - entire case can be decided on the question of...
View ArticleRefund claim u/s 11B The protest is irrelevant inasmuch as the refund claim...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Refund claim u/s 11B The protest is irrelevant inasmuch as the refund claim filed by the respondent is consequential to a Final Order passed by the Tribunal - Claim...
View ArticleConfiscation of goods under Rule 25 of CE Rules 2002 redemption fine in lieu...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Confiscation of goods under Rule 25 of CE Rules 2002 redemption fine in lieu of confiscation was not imposable when goods were allowed to be cleared - Tri - TMI Tax...
View ArticleIfp Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE ST, Ghaziabad - Central Excise - Case...
Ifp Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE ST, Ghaziabad - Central Excise - CESTAT NEW DELHI - Tri - Review/Rectification of order Stay application processing of waste oil consisting of various types of...
View ArticleAssessee manufacturer OR fabricator job work - work was carried out in...
Central Excise - Dated - 6-12-2013 - Assessee manufacturer OR fabricator job work - work was carried out in appellant s own factory premises as per the instructions issued by the appellant - appellant...
View ArticleRAYMOND LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE - Central Excise - Case Laws
RAYMOND LTD Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE - Central Excise - CESTAT MUMBAI - Tri - Assessee manufacturer OR fabricator Job Work - Held that - From the work-orders, it is evident that the...
View Article